| 释义 |
WolfersCOCA²¹²²⁸⁷BNC²³⁶²¹³⁺¹
基本例句
n.沃尔弗斯原型wolfer的复数 A strict feminist and a stringent gender- role traditionalist alike will probably find vindication of their premises between the lines of Wolfers and Stevenson’s careful prose.
严格的女权主义者和严苛的性别角色传统主义者都可能会从 Wolfers和 Stevenson“认真的散文”中找到对他们前提的支持。 yeeyan
“ Labor economists think about firing costs, and family economists think about divorce costs, ” Professor Wolfers said.
劳动经济学家考虑解雇的成本，家庭经济学家考虑离婚的成本。 blog.sina.com.cn
“ Some of the other social changes that have happened over the last35 years— changes in family, in the workplace— may have affected men differently than women, ” Wolfers says.
“在过去的35年里面发生的一些家庭、工作上的变化可能对男女的影响不一样，” Wolfers说。 dict
According to Mr Wolfers, the correlation was unclear in the past because of a paucity of data.
根据沃尔弗斯先生的说法，以前这种联系不明显是因为缺乏资料。 ecocn
But I argue in my comment on the Stevenson- Wolfers paper that “ happiness”, even if accurately measured by these surveys, is not the same as utility or wellbeing.
但是就在我评论史蒂文斯和沃尔弗斯论文的文章里，我就提出了反对意见，即使这些调查的评估测试结果正确，“幸福”也与效应和健康不同。 yeeyan
But other researchers, including Gallup Senior Scientist Justin Wolfers and fellow economist Betsey Stevenson, have challenged the theory.
但是其他的研究者，包括盖洛普高级研究员贾斯汀·沃尔弗斯和经济学家贝西·斯蒂文森则对这一解释提出了挑战。 yeeyan
It’s certainly possible— but as Wolfers and Stevenson point out, recent surveys actually show similar workload patterns for men and women over all.
这当然可能——不过，正如沃尔弗斯和史蒂文森指出的，最近的调查显示出男性与女性的实际工作量总和呈现出类似的模式。 yeeyan
Justin Wolfers of the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania says he has read this claim “ literally hundreds of times and it irritates me so much”.
宾夕法尼亚大学沃顿商学院的 Justin Wolfers表示他可以毫不夸张地说，自己已经把Layard的观点读了“几百遍”，并觉得“很恼火”。 ecocn
No tidy theory explains the trend, notes University of Pennsylvania economist Justin Wolfers, a co- author of The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness.
宾夕法尼亚大学经济学者，也是《女性幸福感下跌的悖论》一书作者之一，贾斯汀沃尔夫斯 Justin Wolfers指出，对这一趋势，至今还没有令人满意的解释。 yeeyan
Stevenson and Wolfers provide a number of possible reasons why this occurred, including non-comparable data over time, and increasing income inequality in the US during this period.
史蒂文森和沃尔弗斯给出了很多可能因素，解释造成此现象发生的原因，其中包括随着时间的消逝数据的不具可比性和这段时期内美国收入增加的日渐不平等。 yeeyan
This is“The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness, ” the subject of a provocative paper from the economists Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers.
这就是“女性幸福感下降的悖论”，一篇由经济学家 Betsey Stevenson和 Justin Wolfers合作的带有煽动性论文的主题。 yeeyan
Wolfers, as the representative of this theory, has his own unique views.
作为该理论的代表人物，沃尔弗斯却有自己独特的见解。 fabiao
Wolfers, being an economist, describes these intellectually challenging but less policy- relevant questions as a sort of scholarly“ luxury good.”
华福是一个经济学家，他把这些所谓技术含量很高却跟政策关联不大的研究课题称作是某种学院派的“奢侈品”。 yeeyan |