| 释义 |
Plessy ˈplesi COCA⁷¹³⁶³BNC²³⁶²¹³⁺¹
基本例句
普莱西
As I've said elsewhere, the members of the Court in Plessy remembered the day when human slavery was the law in much of the land.
我在别处就已经说过，普莱西案的法庭人员一定对奴隶制还是这块土地上许多地方法律的时代记忆犹新。 blog.sina.com.cn
In approaching this problem, we cannot turn the clock back to1868 when the Amendment was adopted, or even to1896 when Plessy v. Fersugon was written.
考虑这一问题，我们无法将时钟拔回到1868年该修正案通过的时候，甚至也不能拔回到1896年普莱西一案判决起草的时候。 zftrans
The “ separate but equal” doctrine adopted in Plessy v. Ferguson, has no place in the field of public education.
“隔离但平等”的原则源于普莱西诉弗格森案，但是这条原则在公共教育方面根本行不通。 iciba
But if Plessy was not wrong, how is it that Brown came out so differently?
但是，如果普莱西案没有判错的话，那为何布朗案却会得出完全不同的判决呢？ blog.sina.com.cn
Most damagingly, they turned up a1952 memorandum in which he supported the “ separate but equal” Plessy ruling of1896, which had established segregation.
更为严重的是，他们翻出1952年的一份备忘录，发现他支持1896年 Plessy案“隔离但平等”的裁决，而这正是种族隔离的基础。 ecocn
The distinguished lawyer Charles Hamilton Houston was born in1895, eight months before the Supreme Court's “ separate but equal” ruling in Plessy vs. Ferguson.
1895年，就在最高法院对普莱西和弗格森颁布了“隔离但平等”的制度8个月前，著名的律师查尔斯·汉密尔顿·休斯敦出生了。 hjenglish
Was it activism to act based on the current meaning of facts that at a purely objective level were about the same as Plessy's facts60 years before?
这是一个根据事实流行的含义而作出的激进行为吗？在一个纯粹的，客观的程度上看，事实与60年前的普莱西案的事实还是一模一样吗？ blog.sina.com.cn
Whatever may have been the extent of psychological knowledge at the time of Plessy v. Ferguson, this finding is amply supported by modern authority.
无论在普莱西诉弗格森时期心理学知识达到了什么程度，这项研究结果还是被现代权威充分证明。 zftrans
You may also need to go back to the readings about Plessy to write your decision.
你也将需要回过来阅读与 Plessy案有关的资料以写出你的判决。 myoops
Was Plessy wrongly decided in1896 or have changing times made it no longer applicable?
Plessy案是否在1896年错判或者随时代的改变已经使得它再适用？ myoops |